HW 2/11

I feel like this passage is the most controversial one that we have read so far. this is because it doesn’t just have two sides like the other stuff we have read, it involves politics. in today’s age arguing politics is something that you cant escape from. when politics are used it makes it very hard for there not to be two very distinct sides, and these two sides will not budge. The view i get from is that i see her ideas as valuable ones. She brings up very good points and strategies to tackle the problem of college debt. It also helps supporting her ideas when you look at her background. When you look at it you see years devoted to likewise work. Another reason that i find her reason believable is because we also read another passage on a similar topic. this time around the author is not as credible seeing that is background isn’t in the topic up for debate.