this article all all about raising money to force law makers to ban guns as a whole. this is the most one sided article out off all the ones i have read for this topic. it starts off listing all the shooting and the death toll for each event. They then focus on how to donate and what they will do with the donation.
this article does’t really classify as one that i would like to use in my paper because of how biased it is. it also doesn’t have that many sources tied to it. this makes it hard to see where they got their information from. the only thing i would use from this paper is the list of shootings and the death toll because it is all in one place.
this paper could be better if they brought up points from the other side. I understand why they didn’t because then less people would be likely to donate if they saw counter points. to combat this all they would have to do is rebut the counter arguments.
Aims of argument 